INSTITUTIONAL PROPOSAL

Co-ownership Law

The building as a self-contained entity: legal standing for every building under the new Property Code.

THE PROBLEM

Co-ownership of buildings in Greece is still governed by Law 3741/1929. The Ministry of Justice has said publicly that the framework needs a full overhaul, and a new Property Code is being drafted.

In practice a building works as a collective unit with no matching legal standing. The result is opaque shared costs, broken continuity in management, weak representation and little room for a reserve fund. Directive (EU) 2024/1275, whose transposition deadline was 29 May 2026, requires barriers to decision-making in co-owned buildings to be removed. That presumes a decision-making body in every building.

The gap already shows. In the Greek "Smart Buildings Infrastructure Readiness" programme the beneficiary is the apartment block, yet the applicant is always a natural person, because the building itself cannot sign a contract.

THE PROPOSAL

Every building under horizontal or vertical ownership acquires, on registration with the Land Registry, limited legal standing for a functional purpose. It covers management, representation, a bank account and reserve fund, and links to the public digital property registers.

The model already works in Germany, Belgium, France and the Netherlands. Co-owners' liability stays proportional, and the entity survives transfers of units and changes of administrator.

THE REQUEST

A dedicated chapter in the new Property Code. Immediate application to new buildings and a transition period for existing ones, with full compliance by 1 January 2030.

The proposal was submitted on 6 August 2026 to the law-drafting committee as an institutional contribution for evaluation, with a full proposal, a roadmap and a comparative study of four European legal orders. The new Code is still being drafted.

Last updated: 18 October 2026

RELATED ARTICLES

  1. A building is not just a property

    A building is not just a property. It is an institution, an investment, a right and an obligation. It stands where ownership, urban planning, the energy transition, legal certainty and quality of life meet.

THE SIX-PART SERIES

Six articles on the building as a self-contained entity, first published on LinkedIn. Each article stands on its own. Read in order, they form a single line of thought.

  1. 01

    PART 1 OF 6 · HISTORICAL CONTEXT

    The building in Greece

    Law 3741/1929 solved a technical problem: how ownership of a building is shared among many owners. Almost a century later, the apartment building has become the dominant form of housing, yet the law remains an agreement between individuals, not an institution with a standing of its own.

  2. 02

    PART 2 OF 6 · LEGISLATIVE REFORM

    The gap today: 97 years on, the same legal framework

    On 2 July 2026 the Ministry of Justice publicly acknowledged that the 1929 framework has reached its limits and set up a committee for a unified Property Code. The planned provisions improve the rules, but none of them makes the building capable of deciding or entering into contracts.

  3. 03

    PART 3 OF 6 · SMART INFRASTRUCTURE

    The building as a hub of smart infrastructure

    Smart electricity, gas and water meters, fibre networks and the new organisation of water services all converge on the building. Yet the apartment building has no legal personality; the gap is not technological, it is institutional.

  4. 04

    PART 4 OF 6 · ENERGY PERFORMANCE

    An environmental obligation without a “subject”

    The transposition deadline of Directive (EU) 2024/1275 expired on 29 May 2026. Energy performance obligations are addressed to the building as a whole, a recipient that Greek law does not yet equip with the capacity to decide collectively and in time.

  5. 05

    PART 5 OF 6 · SMART CITIES

    The smart city model

    The European Commission selected six Greek cities for the Mission “100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030”. Yet a city’s climate neutrality is nothing but the sum of the performance of each of its buildings, and the cell of the system, the building, remains legally undefined.

  6. 06

    PART 6 OF 6 · INSTITUTIONAL SYNTHESIS

    One building, one subject, one line of thought

    Five fields, one gap. The building has an address, meters in its name and obligations towards the state and Europe, yet it does not exist legally as a unit. TERRE has submitted an institutional proposal for its legal standing, based on a comparative study of four European legal orders.

Press kit

Material for journalists, partners and investors.

THE PROJECT

TERRE ΙΚΕ proposes that every building acquire legal standing under the new Property Code, so that it can decide, contract and meet the obligations that Greek and European law already place on it.

KEY FACTS

Type
Institutional proposal
Addressed to
Committee for the new Property Code
Evidence base
Comparative study of four European legal orders
Submitted
6 August 2026
Articles
Six-part series, August 2026

ABOUT TERRE ΙΚΕ

TERRE ΙΚΕ uses artificial intelligence to turn data into knowledge, and knowledge into a tool that delivers measurable results.

IDENTITY

Colour: Deep Sapphire #082567

Investment participation and strategic partnerships

Discussions cover the project’s purpose, each party’s contribution and an agreement on implementation.

DISCUSS A PARTNERSHIP